Skip to main content

People first: Changing the way we talk about those touched by the criminal justice system [Urban.org]

 

Language is powerful. When we talk about people who come into contact with the criminal justice system and refer to them as “offenders,” “inmates,” or “convicts,” we cause these people’s offenses to linger long after they’ve paid their debt to society. Such labeling is both dehumanizing and stigmatizing, ascribing scarlet letters to people based on actions that arguably represent the worst days of their lives rather than who they are sons, sisters, parents, and community members.

After considerable discussion and joint reflection, we at the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center are nowstriving to use words that respect the dignity of all people. As researchers, our work presents a responsibility and an opportunity to influence how the field—and the public—thinks and talks about the populations affected by the policies and programs we study.



[For more of this story, written by Nancy G. La Vigne, go to http://www.urban.org/urban-wir...pdate+-+4%2F6%2F2016]

Add Comment

Comments (1)

Newest · Oldest · Popular

George Bernard Shaw is credited with noting: "To Punish a Man, You must Injure Him; To Reform a man, you must Improve him; and Men are Not Improved by Injuries." If someone "improves" them self, after conviction, should we continue to "penalize" them? The Federal Bonding program, for "Dishonorably Discharged Veterans" and "Ex-Convicts" is intended to address part of this matter. 

I think [juvenile] Judge Steven Teske's 12/8/2015 JJIE article: "States Should Mandate School-justice Partnerships to End Violence Against Our Children", also offers a trauma-informed/ACEs model of viewing those who have had occasion to be caught for violating assorted criminal statutes (http://jjie.org/states-should-...our-children/163156/

Post
Copyright © 2023, PACEsConnection. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×