Skip to main content

Judge Regrets Harsh Human Toll Of Mandatory Minimum Sentences [NPR.org]

iStockPhoto

 

It seems long ago now, but in the 1960s, '70s and '80s, murders and robberies exploded as cocaine and other illegal drugs ravaged American cities.

Then came June 19, 1986, when the overdose of a college athlete sent the nation into shock just days after the NBA draft. Basketball star Len Bias could have been anybody's brother or son.

Congress swiftly responded by passing tough mandatory sentences for drug crimes. Those sentences, still in place, pack federal prisons to this day. More than half of the 219,000 federal prisoners are serving time for drug offenses.

"This was a different time in our history," remembers U.S. District Judge John Gleeson. "Crime rates were way up, there was a lot of violence that was perceived to be associated with crack at the time. People in Congress meant well. I don't mean to suggest otherwise. But it just turns out that policy is wrong. It was wrong at the time."

From his chambers in Brooklyn, a short walk from the soaring bridge, Gleeson has become one of the fiercest critics of mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes.

 

[For more of this story, written by Carrie Johnson and Marisa Penaloza, go to http://www.npr.org/2014/12/16/...ry-minimum-sentences]

Attachments

Images (1)
  • istock_000030612036large_wide-938d6e02988b6bed665f5b23f1e3985cb5029e51-s800-c85

Add Comment

Comments (0)

Post
Copyright Ā© 2023, PACEsConnection. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×