Skip to main content

Ensuring Safe and Affordable Housing Stock Starts with Understanding Who Owns Rental Units [housingmatters.urban.org]

 
By Fay Walker & Eleanor Noble, Photograph: Christopher Boswell/EyeEm via Getty Images, Housing Matters, September 14, 2022

In late 2021, 15 percent of homes purchased across 40 major metropolitan areas were purchased by investors. Thirty percent of properties purchased by investors in these 40 metro areas across the US were located in neighborhoods where the majority of residents are Black. The increase in institutional investors is sending ripple effects across the housing market, especially for tenants with lower incomes.

Mom-and-pop landlords own a larger share of properties that tend to be more affordable than investor-owned properties, and they serve larger shares of tenants of color. They are also less likely to evict tenants, and their tenants are more likely to struggle to pay rent. Compared with larger landlords and institutional investors, this consolidation of rental market ownership can leave small landlords and their tenants vulnerable.

Understanding who owns rental units is a first step toward ensuring a supply of affordable, quality rental stock—and to supporting landlords—but very little data on rental property ownership exist. To help fill the gap, we used publicly available local data to examine rental property ownership and analyze ownership patterns in Minneapolis and Pittsburgh, as well as in Philadelphia, building on existing analysis. Our analysis of rental property ownership can serve as a model for other cities seeking to target limited resources to small local landlords.

[ Click here to read more. ]

Add Comment

Comments (1)

Newest · Oldest · Popular

The homeless include many who have been evicted from their rented residence while, if not due to, suffering significant mental health tribulations; and from there they can become long-termed homeless.

It's additionally offensive that people who cannot afford/maintain an official residence are, by extension, too poor to be permitted to practice what's frequently platitudinously described as all citizens' right to vote in elections.

Seemingly, some people can be considered disposable. Even to an otherwise democratic and relatively civilized nation, their worth(lessness) is measured basically by their 'productivity' or lack thereof. Those people may then begin perceiving themselves as worthless and accordingly live their daily lives more haphazardly. 

Albeit perhaps on a subconscious level, a somewhat similar inhuman(e) devaluation is observable in external attitudes toward the daily civilian lives lost in protractedly devastating war zones and famine-stricken nations; the worth of such life will be measured by its 'productivity', overabundance and/or the protracted conditions under which it suffers. Thus, those people can eventually receive meagre column inches on the back page of the First World’s daily news.

Post
Copyright © 2023, PACEsConnection. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×