Many places, all of which no doubt see things through the eyes of their own paradigm. In general, the more familiar the entire therapeutic community is with the foremost researchers, scientists, authors and thought leaders in the field (specifically areas such as neuroscience, trauma care, psychoimmunology, epigenetics, etc.), the better off each 'branch' of application will be, and the more informed, successful and fluid our conversation and application standards will be, to everyone's benefit. These include but are not limited to Van der Kolk, Scaer, Mate, Levine, Rothschild, Lipton, Ruben, et al. This question presents the community at large with a fantastic opportunity; if not taken as such, a free-for-all where all intervention varietals and schools of thought will fight to dominate the 'standard' will ensue. I surely hope (and participate in developing) the former!