Skip to main content

Parenting with PACEs. PACEs science & stories. Trauma-informed change.

How much would the NAS poverty reduction packages reduce referrals to CPS and foster care placements? Would they reduce racial disproportionality in child welfare? (nasonline.org).

 

Because of a collaboration with Columbia University and UW-Madison, we have answers to these questions.

By Peter Peter Pecora, Casey Family Programs, March 17, 2023 -

Overview

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recently released a “roadmap” to reduce child poverty by as much as half through the implementation of a series of social policy packages. The aim of this study was to simulate the reductions in Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement and foster care placements that are likely to result from implementation of three of the NAS policy packages. In addition to the introduction of a child allowance, the proposed policy packages include reforms to the EITC, SNAP, and the federal minimum wage, among others. (The NAS poverty reduction packages are summarized on page 2 of the study abstract document, and pp. 79-80 in the article.)

Reduction in CPS Investigations

Depending on the policy package and simulation specifications modeled, we find that the child poverty reductions expected under the NAS recommendations have the potential to reduce CPS investigations by 11.3% (Package 2, low threshold) to 36.4% (Package 4, high threshold) -- constituting approximately 386,000 to 1.2 million fewer CPS investigations per year.

Moreover, we find particularly large reductions in CPS involvement that would reduce racial disproportionality substantially.  We estimate an 18.7 to 42.8 percent reduction in investigations for Black children, and 13.3 to 47.6 percent for Hispanic children, compared to 6.7 to 27.9 percent for white children.

Reduction in Out-Of-Home Care Placements

Our simulated effects on CPS involvement imply that 16,000 to 23,000 fewer children would be removed from their home and placed in out-of-home care each year.

The project purchased a special license so that this article can be shared with anyone.

Reference:

Pac, J., Collyer, S., Berger, L.M., O’Brien, K., Parker, E., Pecora, P.J., Rostad, W., Waldfogel, J. & Wimer, C. (2023). The effects of child poverty reductions on child protective services involvement and placement into out-of-home care. Social Services Review,97(1), 43-91.

Attachments:

Pac et al_ 2023 Effects of NAS Poverty Reduction Packages on CPS referrals and Foster Care Placements_Soc Serv Review.pdf

Columbia_UW-Madison_Casey Family Programs Poverty Reduction Study Abstract_3-16-23.pdf

For more information, contact:

Peter J. Pecora

Managing Director of Research Services

Pronouns: He/His

P 206.270.4936

ppecora@casey.org

casey family programs | casey.org

Attachments

Add Comment

Comments (1)

Newest · Oldest · Popular

Great to see more evidence that reducing poverty helps people. (And therefore helps us all while saving money in the long term.)

The NAS report includes poverty reduction packages that have "work" requirements and others that do not have "work" requirements. Our grassroots nonprofit organization, Family and Home Network, has been thinking about family policy issues for decades (and working closely with allies). We call for the adoption of basic principles of inclusion in family policymaking.

Consider the definition of "work"—it excludes caregiving when it's done by parents or family members. Is caregiving "work" only when someone is paid to do it? This is a fundamental characteristic of our economic system (the value of unpaid care is not counted in the GDP). Capitalism values care when it can profit from it, and lobbyists spend millions each year to push for policies that keep parents in the waged workforce.

Yet many parents of young children prefer to care for their children themselves, or have a family member provide care.

The Bipartisan Policy Center’s report, “Child Care Market Survey Analysis” (January 2021) found that only 39% of parents with children under the age of 5 said their ideal care arrangement is a childcare center or family day care. The majority chose "care for my child myself" (22%), care by spouse/partner (8%), by grandparent (9%), taking turns with spouse/partner to care for child (8%), part-day pre-K (9%) or other. Also, researchers report, “There was a 9% increase among Black parents and other parents of color between January and December 2020 who say their ideal child care arrangement is to provide care themselves for their youngest child."

These definitions—of work and of caregiving—are critical to policy discussions.

Last edited by Catherine H. Myers
Copyright © 2023, PACEsConnection. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×